为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。5 |' d. o6 ?$ k1 T) g
* s0 \" ?, L4 o( a6 P* ?5 P& b( ?0 t' f% U
Groups of Agents with a Leader
F) S9 K" w* l" T7 K Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。( q+ r" R2 J- W$ r! _
/ F0 p$ i: n. E只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
$ b5 j) z$ i& r+ C v% T }) l, ]2 O7 e" i y6 [: h! J/ D
0 U1 j% K$ W; \2 T! U
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
& q4 [6 B& t% U6 ?, J3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |