|
|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau
3 w, L3 b( L7 [$ N3 n+ u h' BThere's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort,
; P; \( m$ y, c: R7 i5 }' agrowing in scope as the model progresses.
; J! V1 M) h/ p: I' D+ w! SIn the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-* C2 ~) L6 a) d& x. N* D
ment, analyze, or think.
) i4 e8 A2 L4 Z3 Y8 V7 U& dInstead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|