为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
) y( f n! R) @4 [6 u$ u+ F9 t. I( I5 o2 O( i1 _1 f* I
/ S% V+ F2 D4 z; G
Groups of Agents with a Leader
) x) Z' W9 i6 M, w Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。+ E+ S! X( ^) B9 y5 ]4 c
# @$ W6 f: h) _, t S" m只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
/ O# s; D$ c) T( [7 B
7 x/ W: ?' t/ _/ R7 ~% K
/ [' Q: m+ d M# z# W3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 7 v6 M) `) D" ]6 j
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |