为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。8 V# V% m P- [( s! U8 U% P
2 K6 u% f) `9 Q; V6 p
# C6 x3 I! @+ H5 n8 J& ?4 u/ n
Groups of Agents with a Leader
) ?/ s. u8 r* O, W8 g1 y3 h& t Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。5 w* |: K9 p6 `: U) s
8 H+ s2 @8 A1 C+ e2 j6 F+ ]& X只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
( A. b8 a) ~; |; m, M* z
8 S! M+ I9 g) z% Y7 n+ }8 t Z
) N, S& g4 r% a6 ?* m0 ]: v3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | ' D1 s5 u4 Z+ B+ n4 f
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |