为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
' v. \0 W# O" p/ ?2 k% n1 l
8 ^' }) M6 c0 C4 ]$ F$ T( i* |
- S( a( u7 @& h; ?2 yGroups of Agents with a Leader 3 r, [) l4 D" _9 l0 @
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
; b( _ D( z, l9 W% x4 r
/ T1 ~7 T! ]: w* q& i4 b( R" U- T只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
$ o, M3 r0 h, ?$ Q$ t% G' v8 _) r% F# P- C* \$ r
' b# }/ B1 h! x% C3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 7 b2 d( i( u" f) L p% F% R8 d
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |