为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。4 m$ ]/ I+ r+ M) [, ]4 B" p4 o
B+ k- E+ R2 C3 i% q5 V. ?
0 ]4 F. ?& [- _7 a3 k' D4 w$ p- JGroups of Agents with a Leader
. a; d( P! w0 n* ]% {! Y Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。9 E; a. n3 s+ b: u
/ B( P1 u+ S8 w只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
+ v2 i1 w* W J0 S: m
% }/ n) N& ?% t+ p$ Y, C. \" }- k3 y/ A) q
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | ( K) P& v5 b7 l6 G H. E$ ?
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |