为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
% ?0 N( R* G4 E. _* ~1 l# X
7 n7 k: D9 e* s. l3 Y+ V6 H# D; _8 h6 R9 a m R4 [5 u
Groups of Agents with a Leader 5 N: p7 P, x$ U- | O, }, O# L/ B% G E
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。- T1 {6 F8 ^+ c( [/ W1 a, W
* i7 b8 w' d, g0 G* R/ |; ^
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!9 f# v" s$ A0 R
: v/ G$ K4 A" y4 }# W- G2 ~0 ?
1 J8 w; f: i5 l2 d3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
u3 ], J" Q# K. G6 O2 P7 H3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |