为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。+ q8 X. V! Z$ b$ ^# W7 |+ M
3 k2 {# U. O" R2 b# ^( [
: X5 I7 t5 q1 u* c) Y# [/ kGroups of Agents with a Leader ; L; G' @+ f* b' [
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。9 o2 Y4 P0 R7 L
' b! K# H+ L( v: T+ C- t只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!% p( ^, T- N6 V0 w& S; V3 G
' d0 i3 `) e; Q5 r& v3 }
9 _1 L! i' y" @2 c" V( g$ m
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | ( A9 v# q: R9 Z: U5 Q: R+ W- Q
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |