仿真误区2：Leaving analysis for the end

focuscon

Deborah A. Sadowski ，Mark R. Grabau
% n- K2 ?3 U5 ^" Z, n; wThere's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort,
, F1 S' {7 m, W5 h7 M- Q0 L) r* F) Agrowing in scope as the model progresses.  
In the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-
' ?5 Q& p% A4 r. A8 o0 |* Ement, analyze, or think.
Instead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios.